A lot of different types of injuries a person can receive from a car wreck that you may not expect. Course broken bones are to be expected, but sometimes you can receive traumatic carpal tunnel syndrome. Usually we think of carpal tunnel syndrome is something that a person gets from repetitive use of their hands. Typically things like typing on the keyboard or working in a factory where you’re moving one little part from one place to the other over and over. Sometimes people get carpal tunnel syndrome from using rivet guns or impact wrenches and those are things that we typically think of cumulative trauma.
Cumulative trauma is something that may not cause you an injury the first time we do it or the second time you do it or maybe the third or fourth may not even get it after the first thousand times you do this task, but eventually over months and years that can cause an injury and we call cumulative trauma and the words you have to be exposed to it over and over. A bunch of little traumas cumulate into a large injury, but it’s also possible in some of the gripping the steering wheel and they’re involved in a car wreck caused that carpal tunnel syndrome too. Here, something that can occur in an accident is a nasty scar.
A personal injury attorney that is something that person is entitled to be compensated for any kind of this figure, Matt, no matter how slight tangerine and titles person to compensation, sometimes it could be a barn burner. It’s not uncommon for a person to get burned when the airbags deploy in a car. Usually those burns are temporary in nature, but they’re still entitled to some type of compensation for the pain associated with them.
Even if they are not a long lasting scar, the burn does cause a scar. Then that is something that can be compensated for burns on different parts of a person’s body would have different values. Something that may not be that visible may not be awarded as much by jury as far as how much compensation there wouldn’t be a, for instance, if there’s some burns that’s going to be typically covered up by a shirt or pants. Once the personal injury attorney presents the evidence to a jury, they may think that that’s less valuable than the same burn if it were to occur on someone’s face.
There’s also the times where just because it made one of the lead covered up by shirt or pants, it doesn’t mean that it always will be. For instance, in the summer all wearing shorts is the burn visible. A lot of it becomes subjective in the minds of the judge or jury. I’m wondering on your award for a scar, for instance, the scar on a young attractive lady maybe worth more then at the same scar on an older man it comes to awarding the value next car. It really comes down to block precise. The value is what a jury would award for that injury injury needs to be [inaudible].
How the injury affects someone’s functioning is important, as every personal injury attorney will know. Also, for instance, a scar, he didn’t have those to be a long as an area of clothing because that will rub and be irritated all the time that it’s going to cause more damages than if it’s in a discreet area and causes no physical problems. If it’s in an area such as a pamphlet or somewhere of that nature when you moved or sit, it rubbed across that scar and irritates it and that could cause a little discomfort and a little discomfort over a lifetime and I had a lot of discomfort and consequently should result in more damages under the law.
One item that might limit your ability to collect your damages is the financial wherewithal. I was the person who caused the accident or had a part in causing the accident and their insurance coverage. So for instance, if the person they could chew has no money and no assets, then the likelihood of recovery, any kind of judgment against that person is lower unless they have a large insurance policy. A good personal injury attorney will look for what coverage is available.
There’s also the ability to collect on your own insurance as each personal injury attorney will tell you. If you have what’s called uninsured or under insured insurance, then that might be a source of coverage for you. Also, if the person who’s primarily responsible for the accident may not have assets but someone else that’s a little bit responsible for the accident, then they could be responsible for paying some of those damages that she’s good for cover from the other person alone. One of the first place we looked at trying to find out if might be responsible is the accident report. It’s important, but it’s not completely determined it that has to, what’s the highway patrolman or the policemen investigating the accident wrote on their report?
We’ll try to do their best to give an accurate picture, but they may not get it right every time. They may take the word of the other driver over yourself. You may have other things that can help prove that you were not at fault. Different things can help with bat and sometimes an accident reconstructionist may need to be hired. That’s a person who can look at the damage to the vehicle, check different things, check skid marks and using the laws of physics, trying to determine what actually took place instead of just relied and fond memories which may not be valid in and of bond, what they saw, where they were looking, how they remembered the accident under the stress of the accident. Sometimes person involved in the accident is not able to relate what occurred. Perhaps they became unconscious in the wreck. It’s not uncommon for someone who’s knocked out in a rag to not remember what happened immediately before the wreck. Their memory can be impaired. A personal injury attorney knows how to work with these limitations. It’s also not uncommon for someone to remember the accident and not as the way it occurred. For instance, maybe they were looking away and missed some key points of what occurred and they just assumed what happened when they turn their head away, which may not be what indeed happened.